Purpose
To solve a periodic Sylvester equation A * R - L * B = scale * C (1) D * L - R * E = scale * F, using Level 1 and 2 BLAS, where R and L are unknown M-by-N matrices, (A, D), (B, E) and (C, F) are given matrix pairs of size M-by-M, N-by-N and M-by-N, respectively, with real entries. (A, D) and (B, E) must be in periodic Schur form, i.e. A, B are upper quasi triangular and D, E are upper triangular. The solution (R, L) overwrites (C, F). 0 <= SCALE <= 1 is an output scaling factor chosen to avoid overflow. This routine is largely based on the LAPACK routine DTGSY2 developed by Bo Kagstrom and Peter Poromaa.Specification
SUBROUTINE SB04OW( M, N, A, LDA, B, LDB, C, LDC, D, LDD, E, LDE, $ F, LDF, SCALE, IWORK, INFO ) C .. Scalar Arguments .. INTEGER INFO, LDA, LDB, LDC, LDD, LDE, LDF, M, N DOUBLE PRECISION SCALE C .. Array Arguments .. INTEGER IWORK(*) DOUBLE PRECISION A(LDA,*), B(LDB,*), C(LDC,*), D(LDD,*), $ E(LDE,*), F(LDF,*)Arguments
Input/Output Parameters
M (input) INTEGER The order of A and D, and the row dimension of C, F, R and L. M >= 0. N (input) INTEGER The order of B and E, and the column dimension of C, F, R and L. N >= 0. A (input) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDA,M) On entry, the leading M-by-M part of this array must contain the upper quasi triangular matrix A. LDA INTEGER The leading dimension of the array A. LDA >= MAX(1,M). B (input) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDB,N) On entry, the leading N-by-N part of this array must contain the upper quasi triangular matrix B. LDB INTEGER The leading dimension of the array B. LDB >= MAX(1,N). C (input/output) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDC,N) On entry, the leading M-by-N part of this array must contain the right-hand-side of the first matrix equation in (1). On exit, the leading M-by-N part of this array contains the solution R. LDC INTEGER The leading dimension of the array C. LDC >= MAX(1,M). D (input) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDD,M) On entry, the leading M-by-M part of this array must contain the upper triangular matrix D. LDD INTEGER The leading dimension of the array D. LDD >= MAX(1,M). E (input) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDE,N) On entry, the leading N-by-N part of this array must contain the upper triangular matrix E. LDE INTEGER The leading dimension of the array E. LDE >= MAX(1,N). F (input/output) DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDF,N) On entry, the leading M-by-N part of this array must contain the right-hand-side of the second matrix equation in (1). On exit, the leading M-by-N part of this array contains the solution L. LDF INTEGER The leading dimension of the array F. LDF >= MAX(1,M). SCALE (output) DOUBLE PRECISION On exit, 0 <= SCALE <= 1. If 0 < SCALE < 1, the arrays C and F will hold the solutions R and L, respectively, to a slightly perturbed system but the input matrices A, B, D and E have not been changed. If SCALE = 0, C and F will hold solutions to the homogeneous system with C = F = 0. Normally, SCALE = 1.Workspace
IWORK INTEGER array, dimension (M+N+2)Error Indicator
INFO INTEGER = 0: successful exit; < 0: if INFO = -i, the i-th argument had an illegal value; > 0: the matrix products A*D and B*E have common or very close eigenvalues.Method
In matrix notation solving equation (1) corresponds to solving Z*x = scale*b, where Z is defined as Z = [ kron(In, A) -kron(B', Im) ] (2) [ -kron(E', Im) kron(In, D) ], Ik is the identity matrix of size k and X' is the transpose of X. kron(X, Y) is the Kronecker product between the matrices X and Y. In the process of solving (1), we solve a number of such systems where Dim(Im), Dim(In) = 1 or 2.References
[1] Kagstrom, B. A Direct Method for Reordering Eigenvalues in the Generalized Real Schur Form of a Regular Matrix Pair (A,B). M.S. Moonen et al (eds.), Linear Algebra for Large Scale and Real-Time Applications, Kluwer Academic Publ., pp. 195-218, 1993. [2] Sreedhar, J. and Van Dooren, P. A Schur approach for solving some periodic matrix equations. U. Helmke et al (eds.), Systems and Networks: Mathematical Theory and Applications, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, vol. 77, pp. 339-362, 1994.Further Comments
NoneExample
Program Text
NoneProgram Data
NoneProgram Results
None